Called MCES requesting a copy of my file.
Asked for and spoke to Christine. She in turn transferred the call to ext 160 (Medical Records)
I left a message on that voice mail (Farrah) requesting a call back regarding obtaining copies of records and indicating I would be intereasted in driving to MCES to retreive the file when available.
Farrah called back and will provide a copy of my file. Going there now (4PM) to retreve it. It will include the report from Officer Dougherty with the reason for the 302 - Involuntary Commitment.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Call from Helene
Helene has a hacker friend who has a found the program to hack into WebWatcher. This should allow me to turn off the program - and likely identify the person who installed it.
Working on the details of the file transfer - either online or by hand. Helene flies in on Thursday.
Working on the details of the file transfer - either online or by hand. Helene flies in on Thursday.
Coincidence
Called John and just mentioned yet another coincidence.
Officer Dougherty reports to Lt. Mark Houghtaling. I am fairly certain that Lt Houghtaling is the brother-in-law of Ed Weideman.
Officer Dougherty reports to Lt. Mark Houghtaling. I am fairly certain that Lt Houghtaling is the brother-in-law of Ed Weideman.
Waiting for a phone call
Not one phone call has been returned yet today.
I have called the Montgomery County DA's office.
I have called Detective Richard Marsh.
My lawyer Sarah Armstrong has yet to return a phone call. Last I spoke to her I was begging her to prevent me from being locked up at MCES Bldg #50. Why has she not yet called?
Based on their statement, it appears that I've already spent $2370 with them. (Statement thru July 31, 2007)
$450 of which was expenses for Michael Yanoff. Michael Yannof was the attorney who refused to contact MCES to state that he was a lawyer on my criminal case involving computer monitoring.
I have called the Montgomery County DA's office.
I have called Detective Richard Marsh.
My lawyer Sarah Armstrong has yet to return a phone call. Last I spoke to her I was begging her to prevent me from being locked up at MCES Bldg #50. Why has she not yet called?
Based on their statement, it appears that I've already spent $2370 with them. (Statement thru July 31, 2007)
$450 of which was expenses for Michael Yanoff. Michael Yannof was the attorney who refused to contact MCES to state that he was a lawyer on my criminal case involving computer monitoring.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Description provided to Penn Foundation
According to a document I have seen for the first time the following was the synopsis of my case from MCES.
[direct quote from document at Penn Foundation]
8/10/2007 10:53 am
Presenting Problem
Client was brought to MCES by the Police for writing in his computer it was time for his ex-wife (he is separated) to die.
Police were tipped off by ex-wife.
Client thinks ex-wife is tapping into his computer. MCES diagnosed client with psychotic disorder NOS.
[end quote]
MCES - Montgomery County Emergency Services
NOS - Not Otherwise Specified
BY THEIR OWN SYNOPSIS, THERE IS A HUGE CONTRADICTION. WHY WAS THIS NOT IMMEDIATELY NOTED AND INVESTIGATED? I was involuntarily committed based on this information. Why were doctors and technicians at MCES unable to see the contradiction in the situation and offer immediate assistance instead of psycho-pharmaceutical medications? I never took any of the medications prescribed at MCES as the medications prescribed by the doctors were never discussed with me
[direct quote from document at Penn Foundation]
8/10/2007 10:53 am
Presenting Problem
Client was brought to MCES by the Police for writing in his computer it was time for his ex-wife (he is separated) to die.
Police were tipped off by ex-wife.
Client thinks ex-wife is tapping into his computer. MCES diagnosed client with psychotic disorder NOS.
[end quote]
MCES - Montgomery County Emergency Services
NOS - Not Otherwise Specified
BY THEIR OWN SYNOPSIS, THERE IS A HUGE CONTRADICTION. WHY WAS THIS NOT IMMEDIATELY NOTED AND INVESTIGATED? I was involuntarily committed based on this information. Why were doctors and technicians at MCES unable to see the contradiction in the situation and offer immediate assistance instead of psycho-pharmaceutical medications? I never took any of the medications prescribed at MCES as the medications prescribed by the doctors were never discussed with me
Penn Foundation
I arrived for my appointment and began the paperwork. At 3:00 PM, I met with Marge Kalb. This appointment for me was made pursuant to my court hearing which resulted in my release from MCES.
This session was primarily a form filling session to get paperwork and family history in order.
There was one very revealing document presented by Marge. When I asked for a copy, she refused. When I asked to hand copy the text of one paragraph she initially did not wish to allow it. When I asked her to re-read it and indicated that there was a great contradiction in the statement she agreed to allow me to copy the text word for word. This text appears in the next post.
The session ($35) went very well. Additional appointments were made with Marge and also with the Dr Koziupa.
This session was primarily a form filling session to get paperwork and family history in order.
There was one very revealing document presented by Marge. When I asked for a copy, she refused. When I asked to hand copy the text of one paragraph she initially did not wish to allow it. When I asked her to re-read it and indicated that there was a great contradiction in the statement she agreed to allow me to copy the text word for word. This text appears in the next post.
The session ($35) went very well. Additional appointments were made with Marge and also with the Dr Koziupa.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)